Uncategorized

Happy Birthday, Jack Kerouac

Today is Jack Kerouac’s birthday. He would be ninety-two.

This might not mean anything to some people, but today is like a Name Day for me. While I’m definitely going to rhapsodize over how much his writing means to me, I’m also going to question every good feeling I have for him like I do every year.

A collage I put together for his 91st Birthday

A little something I made for his 91st Birthday

As I’ve previously mentioned, Kerouac was my gateway drug into literature. I inhaled him and kept him in my lungs, allowing his prose, poetry, and philosophy to seep into my bloodstream. I smoked a bag of Lipton tea in the boy’s bathroom in high school because I misunderstood his reference to pot as T, thinking he meant the drink and not THC. I drank sweet manhattans after reading about his attempt to save himself during his stay at Big Sur. The tears I wept at his melancholic and eternal October poetry were French Canadian tears. Every other book of his was either rolled up to fit in my back pocket as I took subways and ferries hither and yon, or revered and only read in my bedroom with wine and coffee far away from the white pages.

Collection as of 2010; before the addition of several biographies and a few first editions

Collection as of 2011; before the addition of several biographies and a few first editions

It’s disgusting, really.

My girlfriend, Magie, bought me a first edition copy of The Town and the City, Kerouac’s first novel. The seller tossed in two newspaper clippings from the time of the release of the novel, including the John Brooks article from the Sunday Times, and Charles Poore’s from the New York Times. I was over the moon. I held in my hands a first edition copy of Kerouac’s first novel for the first time. I was scared to even breathe around it. I realized in that moment that I was now becoming a collector. Before I could make my first purchase, Magie found and gave me a first edition version of Vanity of Duluoz. Now that I knew I could acquire these gems, I scoured the internet for a back issue of the Summer 1968 edition of the Paris Review. It featured an interview with Kerouac in the twilight of his life, bloated, wrinkly, and red like a deflating balloon. When I finally found a copy on Amazon, I panicked.

My first first edition book from Magie

My first first edition book from Magie, with the John Brooks article.

“How could it only be $25?” I asked about the back issue.

“It’s just an old magazine,” Magie reminded me.

But it wasn’t. Although he never touched it, never saw it, and didn’t contribute anything to it, this magazine came out while Jack was still alive. It’s weird, though, because as most of his friends would probably say, Jack really wasn’t alive at that point. He was old before his time and he was confused. God, it’s just so sad.

My most recent pride and joy

My most recent pride and joy.

But this is the part of my diatribe where I stop and ask myself just why it is I love so many things about such a flawed character.

For years I justified my drinking as a rite of passage, or as if it was some sort of hazing ritual in order to join the fraternity of great writers. Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Kerouac, any of the greats. They drank and they drank to excess. I was already a drinker in high school, but it only got worse as my beard got thicker and my fake IDs got better. Once it was more accessible, I drank until I blacked out. Every morning I’d wake up and try to write a story about my escapades with myself as the central character. The only other character with any depth was the booze I drank. Mr. Walker was featured in my first real story, and the Southern Gentleman from Tennessee was a character in my second.

Found in a Brooklyn bar's bathroom.

Found in a Brooklyn bar’s bathroom (an homage to the famous message written in the men’s room of the White Horse Tavern in Manhattan: “Jack Go Home!”)

This isn’t about me, though. This is about Jack’s inability to accept responsibility. He turned his daughter away, despite knowing that she was his own.

This fact, this horrible fact came to me years after I read his fiction and poetry and notes on Buddhism. As I engrossed myself in his words, I started reading biographies about the man whose work forever altered the course of my life. I found my first Ann Charters biography on a fluke, by diving into the dumpster of a closed Brooklyn Heights bookstore. She was as blinded by his figure as I, so she never mentioned his greatest sin, but as I dug deeper, I found more misdeeds.

How could my hero be so deplorable?

Kerouac married, impregnated, alienated, and abandoned his wife, Joan Haverty, and then denied paternity to a child that was unmistakably his. He dodged child support for as long as he could and even when he met his daughter, Jan Kerouac, years later, he explained that while she was a nice kid, and that she could use his name when she wrote, she was not his daughter.

A side-by-side photo comparison of J. Kerouac and J. Kerouac, ≈ the same age

A side-by-side photo comparison of J. Kerouac and J. Kerouac, ≈ the same age

Maybe he wasn’t as bad as all that. He encouraged Ginsberg to make something of himself, which led to the success of Howl, the Human Be-In, the San Francisco Renaissance, the emergence of Buddhism in the United States (thanks, Flavorwire!) …

A list of his influences on the world could go on, and if ever someone were to compile such a list it would be me. But these days, I find myself halting before I come out and say that Jack Kerouac is my favorite writer.

When I was younger and thinner, my friend, Mike, and I took a trip on our bicycles to Lowell, Massachusetts. I quit my job in order to take the week I thought I’d need to do it, and bought a tent and camping supplies in order to be prepared. We created an On the Road experience as we covered the miles between Staten Island and Lowell. We met people and made jokes that I’ll never forget. We ate lots of hot dogs and I drank lots of beer and a few manhattans. Mike went to sleep early,  but I never missed an opportunity to get drunk and bleary eyed in new towns, where I would think about how Kerouac must’ve shared some of the same thoughts while he was drunk and alone, wondering about the universe and the nature of being a writer. Needless to say, the experience inspired a never-completed manuscript with the working title, On They Rode.

I had a bunch of friends that went to art school. They all thought that I was too much of a bro to be a hipster, and that counted against me. My college was full of bros that drove Mercedes and lived in Bay Ridge, but I was always too much of a hipster to fit in with the bros. My friends that were writers were always too intellectual and cared too much about theory and maintaining their position in their ivory towers to really talk to people and write stories for everyone. Everyone else got bored when I tried to talk about books or philosophy.

Kerouac mentions his sense of duality throughout his entire life. It’s present in his journals, his stories, his interviews, and his poetry. I, too, have never really felt like one person. Who am I? Do I want to be a roughneck beer guzzler, or do I want to talk about Foucault, as I wear superfluous elbow patches? There’s much more to this sense of a lack of self, but everywhere I turned as I read Kerouac, I found a mirror held before me.

A particularly poignant passage from Kerouac's prose sketch, Lonesome Traveler.

A particularly poignant passage from Kerouac’s prose sketch, Lonesome Traveler.

As a former athlete with great potential, I quit competing to focus on reading and writing. Once my father left, I grew so close to my mother and was so spoiled by her love for me that I didn’t ever want to move out. The deeper I made it into the echelon of the literati, the more I realized that I didn’t fit in. I could wear the same blazer as someone else, but they wore it better. It was father’s, so the shoulders were worn and windstained from their summers at Martha’s Vineyard (some folks, not all of ’em). My stories seemed to be about people and things, while everyone around me seemed to write about ideas. The more I drank, the more I spoke, but the guiltier I felt in the morning.

Is this about me or Jack? Is there a difference?

“Don’t compare yourself to him,” Magie says. “You’re not a coward like him. You know what responsibility is.”

But that’s not fair. That’s not how I want to end this.

Happy Birthday, Jack. I know you want a drink, but are scared that one’s not enough and twelve’s too many. I know you want to toss the pigskin around, but are scared that some intellectual milksop might call you a Neanderthal. Either way, you’re my literary hero. Thanks for everything.

Introductory Remarks

To open, I’d like to borrow a line from Graham Greene’s novel, The End of the Affair: “A story has no beginning or end: arbitrarily one chooses that moment of experience from which to look back or from which to look ahead.” This is the point from which I choose to begin my story.

As a child, I played outside. I spent time riding my bike around the North Shore of Staten Island. There were stickball and wiffleball games with neighborhood kids, and two-hand touch football that turned to tackle the second someone’s mom stopped watching us. I bullied some kids and was bullied by others, face-to-face, not through zeroes and ones. Arguments were settled with fists and tears, not words and tactic.

But as I grew up and met new people, I shifted from a life of bellicosity to a more cerebral approach to life. I realized that there was something I could do inside, other than watch TV, and something I could do outside, other than tossing sticks and stones and balls around. Books and I found each other accidentally on walks home from school and everywhere I went. I began reading everything I could. Wishbone had done a fine job at introducing me to the rich world of classic literature, and although I remembered what he taught me, I never sat and read the books he said I should.

And so I tried began with lofty literary pursuits. The language of Shakespeare and Hugo wasn’t impossible, but it took a few reads to understand just what each page was saying. After a few more stuffy novels and collections of sonnets, I quickly decided that, although reading was something I wanted to do more of, I definitely didn’t want to only read the classics.

Around this time, my brother was a freshman at Staten Island Tech, a high school where students are required to learn Russian. He brought home a copy of Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov, in translation, and it stayed face down on the bathroom floor for a week before I finally picked it up and tried to read the story about so much. This was the first book I read with an open dictionary immediately next to me the whole time. There were characters with three names, and then one, and then a variation on the one. Like drinking too much wine too quickly, it caused a beautiful headache. I finished The Brothers Karamazov with a craving for more work by the Russian author whose name I couldn’t pronounce. My brother brought home a copy of Crime and Punishment, which I started but didn’t finish within the two weeks his library allowed him to borrow it.

My whistle was whetted, but my hunger was far from sated. A few weeks later, my brother, my unintentional Virgil, left a copy of Jack Kerouac’s On the Road in the bathroom, and that led me to become the person I am today. On the Road opened my eyes to a world of literature that went beyond existential inquiries, and romances with unnecessary complications.

There’s so much that happened over the course of ten years that I have to summarize. I read a lot. I read a lot of Kerouac, Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Miller (both of them), Genet, Ginsberg, Snyder, Baraka, Dostoyevsky, Pushkin, Tolstoy, Bulgakov, Flaubert (for all the wrong reasons), Bukowski, O. Henry, and even a little bit of Joyce. These were the names I turned to most often. It was hard to learn anything else from anyone else directly. Friends suggested big name novels, but no one showed me how to find new books. Didn’t women write books, too? Should I be afraid of Virginia Woolf? Even though I had about two hundred years worth of literature to get through, I wanted to know what people were writing about now (the now that is now then). The harder it became for me to discern which author was worth my time, and which one was just some Oprah’s book club name of the month, the more convinced I became that literature died in the 1980s, and that everything after that time was a perversion of what I loved.

It wasn’t until I started cutting classes in high school and rode the ferry every day that I learned anything about literature. People everywhere read books. If I saw too many people reading the same book, judging a book solely by the cover, I would decide if I should read it or not. I’d walk up Broadway against the flow of traffic and would spend hours in Union Square, watching people who read books, listening to the conversations of people who looked smart, and going to the Strand and the Barnes & Noble in the area picking up books to read. One day I saw a man on the ferry reading a newspaper called TLS. He was wearing round tortoise shell glasses, and I swore that one day, I’d damage my vision enough to need a pair of glasses exactly like his. This chance sighting forever altered the way I heard about books.

College was a commuting affair. The ferry and the subway were my libraries. I went to St. Francis College in Brooklyn Heights. While it might not have the reputation of an NYU or a New School, a student that realizes a passionate faculty of lesser-known professors is superior to the impersonal experience of sitting in a room with 300 other students and a famous author, will get the most out of any situation. I learned about Feminism and Feminist literature. Yes, women did write, and all it took was 500£ a year and a room of one’s own. Walt Whitman was a writer, too, and Leaves of Grass wasn’t the only collection he wrote. A ‘Brooklyn’ writer should only be labeled as such if they spent their life there, not their college years and a few years in a brownstone.

The library at St. Francis had periodicals I couldn’t get everywhere, like the Paris Review and The New Yorker. The more I immersed myself in these outlets that suggested new literature as well as what older literature I should reconsider, the more I realized that there was a bit of a circle jerk in the literary world. Updike and Bellow for the 60s, and anyone from the Iowa Writer’s Workshop after that. There’s nothing wrong with either of these groups, but I knew there was more out there.

Now, in a GoogleSearchAwayFromDiscovry era, I take advantage of how easy it is for me to find new authors, or books by authors I love but haven’t read yet, and order them left and right. Books pile up and ebooks get forgotten. It’s tsundoku, if that’s actually a Japanese word, all over the place.

After making a promise this New Year’s Eve to my girlfriend and myself that I would begin to put myself out there as yet another over-eager reader whose own writing has yet to bring the acclaim and fame I often think it should, I decided I’d make this blog. It may be like so many others, but I promise to be honest, not cutesy. I might put up pictures of typewriters, but they’re not meant to compensate for a lack of content. I promise to you, dear Reader, that this blog will serve as a way of sharing both newer and older literature with you, so that you don’t have to wait to find someone reading a newspaper on a boat to tell you where to find a book.

Look no further than the good ol’ internet: our home away from home while we’re still home, or anywhere else.

I like cheers as well as chastisements. I take suggestions seriously, and will take into consideration anything someone believes I should review or discuss.